Five questions. One clear next step.
This is a quick check against the most common gaps I find in digital health content and flows. The unchecked items are usually where a clinical review begins.
Checked = already in place
Patient-facing automated output is reviewed by a licensed clinician before release, with that review documented somewhere retrievable.
Escalation is triggered by meaning, not only by matching specific words and phrases.
We have tested the flow using clinically acute input, not only typical or average input.
Patient-facing copy does not state or imply that the product assesses, screens, monitors, or clears clinical risk.
We could produce today a record of exactly what an automated surface said to a specific user on a specific date.
00/ 05
The unchecked items are why teams call me.
These five questions point to the same places I look at first in a real review: who is checking the output, how escalation is handled, what the product claims, and whether the record would hold up. Tell me what you are building and I will point you to the right level of review.
Get an individualized assessment of your content.
The checklist is a starting point. A real review looks at your actual flows, your patient population, and the places your team is too close to see. Tell me what you are building and I will point you toward the right level of review.